Trinity

May. 19th, 2025 07:07 pm
boccaderlupo: Fra' Lupo (Default)
The Father remains beyond, elusive, enthroned eternally within the deep recesses of the cloud covering the mountaintops, the divine darkness, essentially unknowable, his secret counsels forever shrouded.

He can only be sought by way of the Son, the incarnate, the proximate, the flesh-and-blood reality we recognize in our everyday lives. He is the Word of the Father, God made audible, whereby all things are brought from the mind of God into realization, conveying the message of Heaven to Earth, bridge across the unfathomable gulf between mortals and the Absolute. He is, too, Christ, the redeemer, insofar as everywhere there is an intimation of the Divine he offers the promise of salvation to those estranged from their Source, in various guises prompting recollection of our heavenly home, every sibyl a signpost on the Way. Thus, the Son reveals the Father.

As both these two are equally Divine and of one substance, their holy breath pours forth from the Father and the Son, one imperishable Spirit that is in all things, giving life and drawing all up into the cosmic mystery.
boccaderlupo: Fra' Lupo (Default)
By chance I had been reading Diarmaid MacCullough's history of The Reformation when I came across a recent post by [personal profile] ecosophia on Protestantism that spurred some reflection, as I have family members who are from that tradition.

The major question, aside from its iconoclasm, that the Protestant Reformation raised for the old Church was about the Eucharist. Regardless of the technical approaches one takes, the main issue, to me, is the questioning itself. Once doubt has been raised about a mystery, any participants who are rocked by such doubts cannot experience it in the same way; that is, you gotta have faith. The reality of the mystery itself, and its efficacy, was directly undermined.

This prompted me to ponder: to what extent did this spiritual attack on the Eucharist create space for other spirits to advance their agendas? A case could perhaps be made, then, that such events as the Enlightenment (advanced by such groups as the Freemasons, et al [side note: the previous Pope Leo was no fan]) and the rise of, say, the National Socialist German Workers party and the Italian fascist party (and their alignments with a renascent heathenry and paganism, respectively) could be traced back, spiritually speaking, to the abandonment of the mysteries and their general deprecation over the centuries.
boccaderlupo: Fra' Lupo (Default)
By the LORD’s word the heavens were made;
by the breath of his mouth all their host.

Psalm 33:6




All multitude participates in a certain respect of the One. —Proclus
boccaderlupo: Fra' Lupo (Default)
"What does Wisdom have in mind for me? And what is this great mystery? Is it God's intention that we who are a portion of God and have slipped down from above should out of self-importance be so haughty and puffed up as to despise our Creator? Hardly! Rather we should always look to him in our struggle against the weakness of the body. Its very limitations are a form of training for those in our condition." —Gregory Nazianzen, from Oration 14

The Name

Mar. 18th, 2025 07:12 am
boccaderlupo: Fra' Lupo (Default)
The most potent anti-magic I have found is the invocation of the name of the Lord Jesus Christ. (So potent is it, in fact, that the first sentence there has probably lost me a substantial portion of readers. If that's not you, friend, read on.) This should not be surprising, as John tells us the name is integral in the discernment of spirits: "This is how you can know the Spirit of God: every spirit that acknowledges Jesus Christ come in the flesh belongs to God, and every spirit that does not acknowledge Jesus does not belong to God." (1 John 4:2-3)

Some more passages regarding the Holy Name (emphases mine):

These signs will accompany those who believe: in my name they will drive out demons, they will speak new languages. They will pick up serpents [with their hands], and if they drink any deadly thing, it will not harm them. (Mark 16:17-18)

And whatever you ask in my name, I will do, so that the Father may be glorified in the Son. If you ask anything of me in my name, I will do it. (John 14:13-14)

Then John said in reply, “Master, we saw someone casting out demons in your name and we tried to prevent him because he does not follow in our company.” Jesus said to him, “Do not prevent him, for whoever is not against you is for you.” (Luke 9:49-50)

Who, though he was in the form of God, did not regard equality with God something to be grasped. Rather, he emptied himself, taking the form of a slave, coming in human likeness; and found human in appearance, he humbled himself, becoming obedient to death, even death on a cross. Because of this, God greatly exalted him and bestowed on him the name that is above every name, that at the name of Jesus every knee should bend, of those in heaven and on earth and under the earth, and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father. (Philippians 2:6-11)

You will protect them and those will rejoice in you, who love your name. (Psalm 5:12)

We could go on and on with these, of course, but you get the idea. Suffice it to say, the Holy Name has tremendous power. I have personally known people who were demonically obsessed/oppressed who have uttered the name in desperation and found immediate relief. Which makes sense, if we regard Christ as the one who lives, who holds the keys to death and the netherworld (Rev. 1:18).

I spent more than seven years practicing a type of planetary magic...for simplicity, we can loosely categorize it as "Ficinian Orphism." It was effective, albeit misguided; conducted in an heterodox Catholic context, it demanded a fair degree of orthopraxy and personal piety from the operator, and that included the diligent use of the Our Father/Lord's Prayer. I suspect the latter was employed as a way of protecting the operator from the spiritual forces at play, but interestingly, this prayer does not pronounce the Holy Name, although it alludes to it ("hallowed be thy Name"). In my experience, however, the actual use of the Holy Name itself was enough to shut off the effects. It was like pressing the mute button on your remote control; I'd never experienced anything like it.

Especially potent is the Prayer of Jesus: 

This simple invocation of faith developed in the tradition of prayer under many forms in East and West. the most usual formulation, transmitted by the spiritual writers of the Sinai, Syria, and Mt. Athos, is the invocation, "Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, have mercy on us sinners." (Catechism of the Catholic Church, 2667)
This calls to mind the "Kyrie eleison" and "Christe eleison" pronounced during mass. For the Orthodox: "Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, have mercy on me, a sinner." 

Of particular interest to those who have some knowledge of qigong: Symeon the New Theologian, in his text "The Three Ways of Attention and Prayer," in discussing prayer, advises:

Then sit down in a quiet cell, in a comer by yourself, and do what I tell you. Close the door, and withdraw your intellect from everything worthless and transient. Rest your beard on your chest, and focus your physical gaze, together with the whole of your intellect, upon the centre of your belly or your navel. Restrain the drawing-in of breath through your nostrils, so as not to breathe easily, and search inside yourself with your intellect so as to find the place of the heart, where all the powers of the soul reside. To start with you will find there darkness and an impenetrable density. Later, when you persist and practice this task day and night, you will find, as though miraculously, an unceasing joy. For as soon as the intellect attains the place of the heart, at once it sees things of which it previously knew nothing. It sees the open space within the heart and it beholds itself entirely luminous and full of discrimination. From then on, from whatever side a distractive thought may appear, before it has come to completion and assumed a form, the intellect immediately drives it away and destroys it with the invocation of Jesus Christ. (Emphases mine)


Despite the "mechanical practice" described above—which is reminiscent of certain "qi" practices, as far as I understand them—the focus remains on the Holy Name itself. I believe the mechanism, therefore, remains incidental and fundamentally different from that employed by those cultivating qi (those knowledgable in that discipline are welcome to weigh in one way or another here), despite some intriguing parallels. Suggesting, to me, that although all cultures seem acquainted with spiritus, they interact with it in diverse ways.
boccaderlupo: Fra' Lupo (Default)
Spiritus—axé, pneuma, chi, et al. By whatever name, the life force which flows through us all. I speculate that although it may be singular, different cultures, having different names for this invisible substance, do different things with it.

The spiritus is the third part of the person, the other aspects being the body and soul. The spirit, breathed into the First Man, gave him life. It is the breath of God, which moved upon the face of the primordial waters of chaos with the Father after Heaven and Earth were made, but before the speaking of the Logos, which is Light itself. (The Logos abides from Eternity in the mind of the Creator, but this primal act of speech began the ordering of the cosmos in time and space, a procession of Heaven to Earth—the prototypical pattern for all subsequent, secondary acts of creation, of making manifest the logoi in the material.)

The conduit for this, and indeed all life, is the spirit, a portion of which dwells within us, a gift of God, even as it permeates the cosmos. It is associated with our breath, and this I suspect is the connecting thread for all the various ways it is used in spiritual matters: the speech of the magus, the breathing techniques of the Taoist, the axé of the singers in the roda, the prayers of the faithful. I suspect, too, that its function is integral to the consecration of the eucharist: the priest's pronouncement, urged on by the assembled laity, serving as sort of "pneumatic vehicle," as it were. I also speculate that this is one of the reasons clerical celibacy is urged: some unspecified, suppressed activity of the "nether regions," as it were, complements the administration of the mysteries, much in the way the Taoist practicing qigong taps into certain streams within the body to move and project this force. If true, then in a very real sense the spirit is effecting the sacramental operations.

Not unlike the Tao, those seeking the Kingdom, the marriage of Heaven and Earth, need to look within.

On Theosis

Feb. 16th, 2025 04:36 pm
boccaderlupo: Fra' Lupo (Default)
"By his gracious condescension God became man and is called man for the sake of man and by exchanging his condition for ours revealed the power that elevates man to God through his love for God and brings God down to man because of his love for man. By this blessed inversion, man is made God by divinization and God is made man by hominization. For the Word of God and God wills always and in all things to accomplish the mystery of his embodiment." —St. Maximus the Confessor, from Ambiguum 7

Gnoses

Feb. 15th, 2025 09:31 am
boccaderlupo: Fra' Lupo (Default)
There is a gnosis of the mind, an apprehension of spiritual truths by reason and the intellect.

There is a gnosis of the heart, wherein spiritual truths are absorbed into the depths of the soul.

If the gnosis of the mind is not joined with that of the heart, it remains arid and detached, meandering in a labyrinth. The spiritual truths cannot be realized.

If the gnosis of the heart is not joined to that of the mind, it may become untethered to reason and subject to the passions and the imagination.

Summo bono

Jan. 24th, 2025 09:37 pm
boccaderlupo: Fra' Lupo (Default)
Via Dante, a virtuous pagan may lead you through the depths of hell and to the summit of purgation.

But when it comes to Paradise, Love must be your guide.
boccaderlupo: Fra' Lupo (Default)
The Philokalia is a treasure trove of spiritual writings from the Desert Fathers of early Christianity, long prized in the Eastern Orthodox church but only of late readily available in English. It is highly informed by mysticism and the contemplative tradition, and I have found it extremely valuable.

What struck me most about the writings is that, rather that being more speculative (say, in a "magical" sense) or full of philosophical conjecture, the writings are grounded in a practical mysticism that is navigable by your everyday person—fair warning, however, that they are ascetic and daunting to anyone predisposed to a certain type of Christian self-interrogation. (Also on a pragmatic note, these writings, along with the Jesus prayer, represent some of the most effective "anti-magic" I have encountered.

The writers have a potent grasp of the workings of the soul that, although not 1:1 with Platonism or Neoplatonism, share some of the vocabulary, if not the same exact understanding (although I'd be surprised if there's not some spillover, given the shared cultural milieu—I'm not Plotinus or Proclus scholar, but I'd suspect these writers would be conversant with some of the same set of ideas).

All that throat-clearing aside, I thought I would share some of the glossary of terms from the English edition, on the theory that these terms may bear fruit when getting one's bearings on the path, whether Christian or other.



Appetitive Aspect of the Soul: the soul's desiring power, one of the three aspects or powers of the soul according to the tripartite division posited by Plato in the Republic (Republic iV, 441). As I reckon it, desire.

Intelligent Aspect of the Soul (to logistikon): A faculty that seems to refer to the functioning of the Intellect (Nous), referring to the perception of spiritual realities. Not to be confused with Reason (dianoia), which is "the discursive, conceptualizing and logical faculty," whose function is "to draw conclusions or formulate concepts deriving from data provided either by revelation or spiritual knowledge" or sense data.

Incensive Aspect of the Soul: Often manifests itself as wrath or anger...per the glossary, that which provokes "vehement feelings." (The "spirited" part, per Plato.) I think of it as the Ares to the Aphrodite that is the soul's appetitive power. Both of these are generally considered parts of the soul's passable aspect and vulnerable to exploitation by the passions.

Dispassion: For some of these writers, "a state in which the passions are exercised in accordance with their original purity," "a state of reintegration and spiritual freedom" which according to Cassian is equivalent to purity of heart.

Intellect/Nous: The highest faculty, which, when purified, knows God or the inner essences or principles (Logos) of created things by means of direct apprehension or spiritual perception. Regarded as dwelling in the "depths of the soul," it also functions as the "eye of the heart." By my understanding, as the eyes are among the organs used to perceive sensible realities, so the intellect is used to perceive spiritual (noetic) realities (see "intelligent aspect of the soul.") For the Desert Fathers, it requires watchfulness, insofar as it operates as the door whereby bad actors can get into the soul.

Heart: In this case, not the physical organ, but the spiritual center of a person, the "inner shrine." I'm unclear on this, but I suspect this is the seat of volitional activity, such that the things we admit into our hearts—such as disordered passions—linger there and fester, ultimately occluding the Intellect/Nous and it's ability to perceive the Divine. Papa Francesco recently wrote a letter on the heart, for what it's worth, with a shoutout to Homer, to boot.

Flesh (sarx): Both the sensible, physical body of a human (incarnation/embodiment), and the complete soul-body apparatus, which, for the Desert Fathers has fallen into disarray. For my part, it's also analogous to "the World," that is, the overall fallen state in which we find ourselves mired, despite a yearning for return.

Fantasy: Per the glossary, the image-making faculty of the soul, which I reckon is, in short, imagination. Like the other aspects of the soul aforementioned (desire and anger), it can be exploited by bad actors, be them human (CF advertisers, sorcerers) or non-human (spirits). For the Desert Fathers, generally not something to play around with, as this is another means of entry to the soul, so perhaps an extension of the intellect/Nous.

Perhaps some may find value, as I have, in these definitions...any misunderstandings in transcribing and commenting on them are entirely mine.
boccaderlupo: Fra' Lupo (Default)
Consider this a working hypothesis for how spiritual influences come to be manifest in the sublunar world (our "everyday" lives).

Loosely speaking, there is an unseen world populated by myriad spiritual entities. These extend in hierarchies, the nature of which those far wiser than I can speculate about; the main idea, however, is that those entities lower down in the hierarchy are subject to and participate in those above them.

The material world of our everyday experience, matter, the regularities of which are ably captured by the standard model of physics and the other branches of science, is not adjacent to the spiritual cosmos, but is downstream from it, inasmuch as the spiritual gives rise to the material.

The spirits—daemons—are intelligences with wills much like ours, but are disincarnate and have limited purchase over matter.

If we imagine the EM spectrum, however, we consider the various energies going from shorter wavelengths (gamma rays) down to longer wavelengths (radio waves). We might regard matter, the brute particles that comprise our bodies and the physical objects we interact with on an everyday basis, as a further extension along that spectrum—mass energy that moves with velocities less than the velocity of light. These gross substances, then, are not fundamentally different than the radiant energy farther "up" the chain.

If we deem us mortals as having souls, spirits, and bodies, it is in this way that the "fine ether" of spirit (ultimately being manifest, say, as neural connections) bridges the gap between our souls and our physical bodies.

It is in this sense that theories of spiritual rays and their corresponding sympathies with "incarnate" substances hold. Although we might try to distinguish between spiritual magic (magic explicitly invoking spiritual intelligences) and "natural" magic (which merely tries to manipulate and align those sympathies), they are fundamentally both the same: they are attempts to align correspondences so as to manifest spiritual action in our mundane lives...incarnation, effectively. (Ex. The color red, part of the spectrum of visible light, resonates with Martial spirits; the operator singing or vibrating a particular note; etc.)

Some of the anecdotal phenomena associated with, say, haunted places suggest the limited action that spiritual intelligences have in the sublunar world. For instance, there may be disruption of electronic devices (visible light, fairly "high" along the EM spectrum), or knocking (sound waves). Some devices may even pick up faint sounds of voices, etc. Spiritual sensitives may be more apt to feel the "vibes," but the more manifest disincarnate entities become, the more they are able to produce physical effects.

I argue that disincarnate spiritual entities have a greater purchase over shorter wavelength features, such that they are more readily able to produce optical or auditory manifestations; this is why many "paranormal" events leave scant to no physical evidence. In those instances where one does find spiritual intelligences having a foothold in grosser material substances, you will find haunted objects, places—and people.

This is where the will comes into play, because in the case of a magician, the operator's will is instrumental in attempting to exploit the aforementioned correspondences. The alignment of sympathetic substances and symbols is enough to precipitate action, but the involvement of the will is critical to the operation.

It's in this same sense that the Church warns against magic, because the will is the door by which disincarnate intelligences can overtly (rather than distantly) impact the physical cosmos. As Padre Pio notes, the demon has only one door—the will.

Given the nature of free will, a person can deliberately shut this door and cast out any unwanted spiritual influence (including, I suppose, the benevolent (CF atheists)).

Returning to the magician, the operator must cultivate both knowledge and the will to action. In a Christian context, the operator may think that he or she is in some way controlling these influences, but, given the nature of participation, things "higher up" the chain will most likely prevail over the will of things "farther down" (us mortals). The operator can produce haunted objects that allow spirits greater purchase in the material; likewise, the operator's will may gradually become captured by and subject to those intelligences, commonly called possession. This is often a gradual process whereby spiritual actors, welcomed into the will, gradually overtake the mortal, who may, despite his or her best intentions, become unable to dispel them. (Think of an addict who may halfheartedly wish he or she could quit their addiction, but find themselves unable to cast out that lingering urge that continues to burn within; alternately, the wills of some psychopathic killers and cult leaders may become so subsumed by the spiritual intelligences they have invited in that their original personalties are not discernible.) At such a point, only an appeal to a higher actor along "the chain" can do the trick (exorcism).

Malignant daemons ("demons" proper) tend to be more obstreperous than benevolent spirits, which is why the Desert Fathers, many of whom had serious battles with the demonic in the wastelands, advocated against trying to visualize spiritual entities or discourse with them altogether, since even malevolent intelligences can masquerade as "angels of light," as it were. Thus we have stories of monks who effectively ignore the charisms afforded them, in their ardor not to be led astray by bad spiritual actors, and, so it is said, thereby obtain greater virtue.
boccaderlupo: Fra' Lupo (Default)
"I am the true vine, and my Father is the vine grower...Remain in me, as I remain in you. Just as a branch cannot bear fruit on its own unless it remains on the vine, so neither can you unless you remain in me. I am the vine, you are the branches...If you remain in me and my words remain in you, ask for whatever you want and it will be done for you." — Jesus Christ, John 15

"The cup of blessing that we bless, is it not a participation in the blood of Christ? The bread that we break, is it not a participation in the body of Christ?" — St. Paul, 1 Corinthians 10:16

"We have here an exposition of the metaphysics of Iamblichus. The levels of realities are the One-Good, the Limit and Unlimited, the intelligible, the soul, and celestial and terrestrial bodies. Between these levels of reality, relations are established by participation, with the inferior being in a relation of model to image with the superior, which is its cause." — Luc Brisson, "Chapter 18 of the De communi mathematica scientia. Translation and Commentary" Iamblichus and the Foundations of Late Platonism

"The ascent to the divine is conceptualised as enabling the human to participate in divine power and activity through assimilation and likeness to the divine through the effective utilisation of divine symbola..." — Crystal Addey, "Iamblichus on Mathematical Entities." Iamblichus and the Foundations of Late Platonism
boccaderlupo: Fra' Lupo (Default)
"God belongs to all free beings. He is the life of all, the salvation of all—faithful and unfaithful, just and unjust, pious and impious, passionate and dispassionate, monks and seculars, wise and simple, healthy and sick, young and old—just as the diffusion of light, the sight of the sun, and the changes of the weather are for all alike; 'for there is no respect of persons with God'." — St. John Climacus, The Ladder of Divine Ascent
boccaderlupo: Fra' Lupo (Default)
I wish to elucidate, so far as I can, a subject that is as subtle as it is profound. The infinite and bodiless Lord, who is beyond being, in His infinite bounty embodies and, so to say, reduces Himself so that He can commingle with the intelligible beings that He has created—with, that is, the souls of saints and of angels—thereby making it possible for them to participate in the immortal life of His own divinity. Now each thing—whether angel, soul or demon—is, in conformity with its own nature, a body. No matter how subtle it may be, each thing possesses a body whose subtlety in substance, form and image corresponds to the subtlety of its own nature. In the case of human beings the soul, which is a subtle body, has enveloped and clothed itself in the members of our visible body, which is gross in substance. It has clothed itself in the eye, through which it sees; in the ear, through which it hears; in the hand, the nose. In short, the soul has clothed itself in the whole visible body and all its members, becoming commingled with them, and through them accomplishing everything it does in this life. In the same way, in His unutterable and inconceivable bounty Christ reduces and embodies Himself, commingling with and embracing the soul that aspires to Him with faith and love and, as St Paul puts it (cf I Cor. 6:17), becoming one spirit with it. His soul united with our soul and His Person with our person. Thus such a soul lives and has its being in His divinity, attaining immortal life and delighting in incorruptible pleasure and inexpressible glory. — St. Macarius of Egypt, as paraphrased by St. Symeon Metaphrastis, The Raising of the Intellect


Buon Natale a tutti!
boccaderlupo: Fra' Lupo (Default)
"...the heart itself is but a little vessel, and yet there are dragons, and there lions, and there venomous beasts, and all the treasures of wickedness; and there are rough uneven ways, there chasms; there likewise is God, there the angels, there life and the kingdom, there light and the apostles, there the heavenly cities, there the treasures, there are all things." — St. Macarius of Egypt, Homily 43:7
boccaderlupo: Fra' Lupo (Default)
Speculum Romanae Magnificentiae- A Putto Presenting Grain to Ceres MET DP870236Miguel Cabrera - Allegory of the Holy Eucharist - 1750Wine cooler with A Marine Triumph of Bacchus MET DP316531

Of bread and wine, of body and blood, of death and life
boccaderlupo: Fra' Lupo (Default)
"For whosoever will save his life shall lose it: and whosoever will lose his life for my sake shall find it." —Christ


"Deos facturus qui homines erant, homo factus est qui Deus erat." —Athanasius


We shall all be united with the Divine—eventually, and by diverse, winding paths, after the consummation of the ages.

For the Unknown (and Unknowable) God is a consuming fire. Some, perhaps many of us, are bound to take a longer path: the Divine Light can only seem an affront to our carefully cultivated personae, and so we flinch and flee from it. In thrall to spirits themselves in flight from the Alpha and Omega, we throng the spring of Lethe, drowning in forgetfulness and returning again to walk that fraught road among the exiles.

But others, perhaps more fortunate, recognize in the divine powers the expression and full flowering of the Good, the mark of Divine Eros, the same that generates the worlds. Partaking of Eunoe, they bask in the Divine Light and return to the source, to assist in the labors of angels, until the restoration of all things.
boccaderlupo: Fra' Lupo (Default)
I may have written about this before, but when I was younger, I had a vision of the Christ upon the cross.

It was during the summertime, maybe after sixth grade. It was like a dream, but more than a dream. I saw him. Between us there was a gulf, almost infinite; you could not rescue him if you tried. But the key was that he was allowing this gulf. He hung suspended over this terrible abyss for all eternity. His face was one of infinite sorrow for the whole sorry human race, as he was bearing the sins of the many.

It seemed to me, then, that this was Hell: a void, a total absence of Love, infinite loneliness. The gulf was a black and purple hue, and alone the Savior in the midst of it, cut off from all lovingkindness—and yet he had taken it upon himself to put himself there, for who else but God could select infinite alienation? My thought was that he had chosen to experience the human condition, in its worst way...its estrangement from Love and the Divine. I wept, because we could not save him. And the paradox was that although he had caught himself off from redemption, he was in fact the source of lovingkindness himself, and the source of redemption himself.

This then was the paradox of the crucifixion—part of its mystery, perhaps, and how Love could transcend death and Hell itself. The sorrow struck my heart, and I could not forget it, even all these years later. It made me quite redoubled in my formal religiosity for a time, but then I drifted away, as a person cannot be good all on their own without divine aid. In some ways, perhaps, I may have been deliberately trying to forget—a search for the relief of Lethe. I drifted, like Dante lost in a dark wood, until the call again came to take up the Path of Return.

May the Divine keep you safe, dear reader, and may the Uncreated Light shine in your heart.

Dies Iovis

Mar. 24th, 2022 07:38 am
boccaderlupo: Fra' Lupo (Default)
Not only the riches and splendor of the great
are the dominion of Kronion Zeus—
no.

The soft patter of rain in the garden,
a heart blooming with good cheer,
a house brimming with laughter,
the shouts of children at play
in verdant fields—

these and much more are
the bounties of Immortal Giove,
father of gods and men,
who freely bestows his good gifts
upon happy mortals,
the showers of his manifold favor.
Page generated May. 28th, 2025 01:59 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios